Tuesday, February 23, 2016

Sexpot Gary Johnson Announces His Candidacy For President

Oops, the title should read "Libertarian Gary Johnson Announces His Candidacy For President". I didn't change it because the "error" is intentional. I got it "wrong" on purpose as an attention grabber. Not that I think calling Johnson a "sexpot" is inaccurate, given the fact that the definition of sexpot is "a sexually attractive person".

Yeah, I've only ever heard this term applied to women, but in Gary Johnson's case I think it is very fitting. I mean, who the hell would deny that Gary Johnson is a incredibly sexy man? Not me, that's for sure.

In any case, the point of this post is to speak of Gary Johnson's announcement that he's running for president. Something he announced on 1/6/2016. Which was more than a month ago. But I didn't miss it. I just didn't blog about it here. Because, despite me saying that "Gary Johnson is Dreamy" was not abandoned, it actually was (and I knew I was abandoning it at the time... meaning I lied).

In any case (again), GJID has now been reopened and there will be a flurry of activity. By which I mean MANY commentaries will be authored concerning GJ once again throwing his hat into the POTUS ring. Now, realistically, Johnson will have about as much chance of being elected president as a snow ball forming in the Mojave desert at high noon.

It will, however, be refreshing to hear a candidate that has different and reasoned ideas without the hyperbole and general BS the rEpublican party candidates are offering. Not that much different, to be honest, however. Both rEpublicans and Libertarians want to accelerate the transfer of wealth from the middle and lower classes UP to the more deserving classes.

And, obviously, because I support Johnson I'm onboard with this agenda. What makes Johnson different from the rEpublicans is that Johnson believes government should get out of the way and allow the plutocrats to rape and pillage. The Republicans, on the other hand, think that the raping and pillaging the plutocrats do should be a joint venture. The wealthy and government rulers should be partners, in other words.

Gary Johnson says no to this partnership. Gary, as a Libertarian, asks why the hell should the plutocrats split the profits gained by bilking and exploiting the less deserving classes? Gary Johnson is, BTW, a self-made millionaire who wants to be president so he can look out for the interests of other millionaires.

And, is there anything wrong with that? Lying Lester says no. Lying Lester also says that, while GJ's chances of getting elected to the WH are low, it isn't 100 percent inconceivable that he could be our next president. Perhaps only 99.9 percent inconceivable. But that means he has a .1 percent chance. Which is better than no chance.

We can hope the media doesn't ignore Johnson, all the while knowing it will. Why? I don't have a clue. Frankly it baffles Lying Lester's imagination. Big media personalities are rich, after all. Don't they want someone who's on their side looking out for their interests?

Not that the rEpublicans aren't looking out for the interests of the wealthy. They are. But the way they go about it is almost all wrong. The BEST way to look out for the interests of the wealthy is to let the wealthy look out for their own interests. The only thing they REALLY need is a president (and cooperative Congress) that wants to shrink government. Get it out of the way so the wealthy can prosper wildly.

Not that they aren't prospering wildly already, but GJ knows they can prosper even more wildly. And isn't that something we all want? I'd hope so, but if that were true more of the populace would be Libertarian, which they obviously aren't. The reason for that, I think, is that so many people are incredibly greedy. They want what rich people have, and want to use government to take it from them.

Bernie Sanders is promising to do even more of this. "This" being stealing from the Makers to give to the Takers. Sanders, the avowed democratic socialist, turns off as many civil libertarians as he excites, why? His economic socialism.

Anyway, I continue to like Johnson due to the fact that he has (in my view) good sense and the plutocrat's best interests in mind. Eh. This is why both cOnservatives and pRogressives ignore him.

Byline: This gary-tastic commentary was authored by Lord Lying Lester, purveyor of johnsoning. GJID-14.

Sunday, August 23, 2015

Gary Johnson Is Dreamy Has Not Been Abandoned

No, there has not been a new commentary here in quite some time... which is why I decided to check in to let my fellow Gary Johnson fans/admirers know that this blog has not been abandoned. That is, I have not forgotten about it. Although I haven't posted here and currently have no plans to resume posting on a regular basis.

Don't get me wrong, I still am a HUGE fan of Mr. Johnson and am still REALLY hoping that he jumps into the race and becomes a contender for the presidency in 2016. It's just that right now there isn't a lot to report on that front. A 4/8/2015 Daily Caller article says "Gary Johnson Preparing To Run For President In 2016".

I will definitely be signing up to canvas and/or phone bank for Gary... once his campaign is up and running. And I'll write up my activities on this blog. As for the other Libertarian running for POTUS, Rand Paul? I might consider voting for him, although, as Mr. Johnson himself points out, Rand falls short in a number of areas. His stands on a number of issues make him sound more like one of the other Republicans, instead of a Ayn Rand Libertarian.

Asked about the libertarian-leaning Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul's entrance into the race this week, Johnson said: "I like the fact that he's running. I mean of all the Republicans, he's the closest to my ideology. The things that we differ are immigration, marriage equality, women's right to choose, drug policy and military intervention".

OK, so I too like that Rand is running. However, while he may be "closest" to Gary ideologically, he is not close enough, IMO. Running as a Republican, Rand is obviously pandering to the fake-deity worshipping rubes that make up the GOP base. These are simple-minded fools that Lying Lester laughs at. Voting for a candidate who has to suck up idiots for votes rubs Lying Lester the wrong way.

The WAY wrong way, in fact. I'd rather vote on principal and keep my integrity, frankly. Plus, is Rand Paul lying to get votes he'd otherwise not get, or does he really believe in the imaginary sky God?

No, I think Rand Paul compromises Libertarian principals way to much to get my vote. Maybe I'd consider voting for him if Gary does not run. Although, if that were to happen I might run myself. Lying Lester would be the 2nd best candidate behind Gary Johnson, in my not-at-all humble opinion.

Why? Because Lying Lester is with Gary Johnson 100 percent. Although I do believe the United States needs to wipe out ISIS by bombing the hell out of them. And by also droning them 24/7. In this regard I'm probably more with Rand's belief that the flea-infested ISIS terrorist phony-prophet-mUhammed-worshipping scumbags need to be exterminated.

So, maybe I'm 98 percent with Gary? I'm absolutely with Gary in his Randian (Ayn, not Paul) belief that the Taker mentality is a huge problem that the next president needs to, but probably won't, address. America needs to stop oppressing those who create by stealing from them. Redistributing the wealth of the producers to keep the non-producers alive.

The non-producing parasites, like the ISIS parasites, need to be exterminated. Although the non-producing Takers don't need to be bombed to accomplish this. Just cut off their free government goodies (goodies stolen from Makers like Lying Lester!!!)... and they will starve to death. Some will get off their fat asses and find a job, while others will starve. Which is how it should be.

In any case, Gary is the REAL Randian candidate, while the dude named "Rand" is the least Randian. Of the two. Rand Paul is obviously more Randian then the other Republican hopefuls.

Rand Paul is the better choice among Republicans. But Gary would be the best choice... obviously. He's also much better looking than Rand Paul. Gary is a smoking hot stud, while Rand Paul is a pipsqueak with bad hair. Not much there to get someone fired up about. He falls short in regard to the Libertarian ideal, and he's unpleasant looking to boot. Whereas Gary Johnson is VERY easy on the eyes.

Yep, the choice my friends is an easy one. I'm voting for Gary and remaining deludedly hopeful that Mr. Johnson will be our next president. Then we can start transitioning to a system that doesn't punish producers like myself. And, instead, start punishing the non-producers by cutting off the free stuff all the other candidates want to hand out (to buy votes). It's called INTEGRITY people, and Gary Johnson (as well as Lying Lester) has it in spades.

Byline: This gary-tastic commentary was authored by Lord Lying Lester, purveyor of abandoning. GJID-13.

Monday, September 22, 2014

I Would Shave My Facial Hair For Gary Johnson

Some people do not like kissing a man with facial hair, and I do have a beard (as seen in my profile picture). Now, as far as chicks go, Lying Lester has does not give a shit if a woman does not want to kiss him because of his facial hair. The reason is because there are plenty of women who would (and do) kiss Lying Lester... with his facial hair.

However, as you should know, Gary Johnson keeps his face clean-shaven. Does this mean that Gary Johnson is opposed to facial hair? I do not know. I would like to announce, however, that if Gary wanted me to shave, I surely would. Provided I would get a kiss from Mr. Johnson. A kiss from him, or an agreement by him that I could kiss him.

If a condition of that kiss would be that Lying Lester shave his facial hair, he would do it in a heartbeat. Although I would allow it to grow back after the kiss, as I think facial hair is very sexy. But that is just my personal opinion, and if Gary does not agree that is fine with me.

And I'd shave my face clean if it would get me a kiss from Gary. And I'd also keep my face clean shaven if I could CONTINUE getting kisses from Gary. Because Gary is a very sexy man that ANYONE would be thrilled to kiss or be kissed by. Acknowledging this absolutely does not make Lying Lester "gay".

It simply makes him a connoisseur of beauty. Whether that beauty be feminine or masculine, Lying Lester wants to make love to the person that possesses it. Or, the person that posses it and is female. In regards to males that possess great beauty, Lying Lester also requires the mind be beautiful.

And, as far as that goes, Gary Johnson is the ONLY male that I've ever been attracted to (body AND mind). Therefore Lying Lester considers himself to be a hetorsexual and completely straight Man. Not "gay" or even bi-sexual. Also, as far as women go, Lying Lester only requires physical beauty, and - let it be known - that I've made love to thousands of women who were not that bright.

Not that Lying Lester is aware of too many women who measure up to the intelligence of an intelligent man. Given that men, in my opinion, are generally smarter. And given that women are usually emotion-driven. More so then men, that is for sure.

In any case, that is not relevant to my desire to kiss or be kissed by Mr. Johnson. Or engage in the act of lovemaking with him. If shaving is what it would take, I would be willing to shave not just my face, but my entire body, #Dolphinsmooth. Not that I think Mr. Johnson would be interested... but if he was I would do it.

Byline: This gary-tastic commentary was authored by Lord Lying Lester, purveyor of shaving. GJID-12.

Friday, September 5, 2014

Proof Completely and Totally Straight People Can Experience Same-Sex Attractions

Individuals on another blog have speculated that Lying Lester might be a repressed/in-the-closet homosexual because he has expressed feelings of attraction for 2012 Libertarian candidate for president Gary Johnson. But nothing could be further from the truth. Lying Lester is not "gay", despite entertaining the possibility of getting it on with Mr. Johnson.

Look no further than actress Angelina Jolie for proof that straight people can be attracted to others of the same sex. Info that follows from a 9/3/2014 "Us" article concerning Jolie's feelings regarding Japanese-American FEMALE model Jenny Shimizu. A person the article refers to as an "ex-girlfriend".

[Angelina] Jolie and Shimizu first met on the set of their 1996 film Foxfire. At the time, Jolie was married to her first husband Jonny Lee Miller. Still, the Oscar winner [said] that the initial spark with model-actress Shimizu was very much palpable.

"[I was] surprised when I suddenly found myself having these feelings I always had for men, but for a woman", Jolie told... Barbara Walters. "And wanting to kiss her and wanting to touch her".

"I would probably have married Jenny Shimizu if I hadn't married my husband", Jolie, now 39, told the mag in 1997. "I fell in love with her the first second I saw her". (Link).

Angelina Jolie gay? I doubt it. She just married actor Brad Pitt. And, having a biological child together, they've obviously done it. And, in regards to Jolie, Lying Lester would definitely hit that, despite being turned off by Angelina's political views. Although Jolie did, at one time, express an interest in playing Dagny Taggart in the "Atlas Shrugged" movie based on the great philosopher Ayn Rand's magnum opus.

Lying Lester would be interested in some pillow talk with Mrs. Jolie (after the sex) in order to discuss what the deal was with that situation. Also, for the record, Lying Lester was not surprised at all when he first felt the desire to "kiss and touch" Gary Johnson. Not because Lying Lester is "gay", but because of Mr. Johnson's intense sexual magnetism.

"How could ANYONE of ANY sex not be attracted to Gary?" I asked myself. They couldn't, not unless they were an extreme partisan who rejected Gary due to their prejudices against Libertarians. And even then I'm sure that - in some dark recess of their minds - these people have some attraction toward Mr. Johnson. They simply deny it.

So, Lying Lester "gay"? No way. But, would Lying Lester "get it on" with Mr. Johnson if the opportunity arose? You bet I would. In a heartbeat. Although I would not marry him. Not unless the marriage was "open", as Lying Lester is still very much attracted to the ladies. And ONLY the ladies. With one exception, of course.

Although, now that I'm pondering the issue, I think that I might marry Gary if he popped the question. Maybe. I'd have to give it a lot more thought... thought that I've never given it up to now. And thought I'll likely never give it. Why bother when Gary Johnson would never ask Lying Lester to be his husband? We don't even know each other for goodness sake!

Still... "Mr. Gary Johnson" has a nice ring to it.

Byline: This gary-tastic commentary was authored by Lord Lying Lester, purveyor of... GJID-11.

Monday, September 1, 2014

A One Night Stand With The Kardashian Sisters Or Gary Johnson?

Sure, they're stupid, shallow, shameless, deceitful, and irresponsible. But one could not deny that they are quite attractive, unless said person is a moron. If Lying Lester were young, single, and looking I would not need to be drunk for a one nighter. There ain't much between the ears for sure. But sometimes, when your young, that is not important. For one night.

But for an individual that has a LOT going on between the ears as well as the psychique of an adonis that ANY human would find attractive, I say Gary Johnson fits the bill. On that topic, I've always wondered what a one nighter with Gary might be like, despite being a completely straight Hetro Man.

So, why would Lying Lester swing the other way for Gary? Well, like I said earlier, there is not a human alive that could deny that Gary is a very attractive man, and Lying Lester acknowledging this fact in no way makes him "gay". Not that there is anything wrong with being gay, per say...

I just think it's important to note that Lying Lester is VERY much into the ladies. Yes, it is true that I have bagged hundreds of females - by which I mean I've had sexual relations with MANY women and always enjoyed the experience. And I can assure you that my female partners have enjoyed the boinkings as well.

Point is, Lying Lester is only attracted to women. Women, including the Kardashian sisiters - whom Lying Leser would boink the hell out of. But no men. At all. Unless that man was Gary Johnson, that is. For him Lying Lester would make an exception (and boink him).

Which is why, if Lying Lester had to choose between a one night stand/four way with the three Kardashian sisiters - and a one night stand with Gary Johnson, the choice would be an easy one. Lying Lester would choose Gary any day of the week (and boink him and be boinked by him). And Lying Lester would consider himself a very lucky man if that happened.

Byline: This gary-tastic commentary was authored by Lord Lying Lester, purveyor of one night stands. GJID-10.

Friday, August 29, 2014

60's Sex Kitten Tuesday Weld? Lying Lester Would Have Devastated Her

60s Sex-Kitten, Tuesday Weld. I'm just gonna mimic what the Macho Man, Randy Savage, would have said, "Ooooooooooooooh Yeaaaah!!!" Yep, gorgeous and sexy. Or as Al Pacino might say... whoahhhhhh!!! Lying Lester would definitely have banged her, and Tuesday would have been very grateful for the offer, as well as the sex.

And then Lying Lester would have "done" her sister Monday as well. Or he would have done them both at the same time (a threesome).

Point is, Lying Lester likes the LADIES. And the ladies ONLY. Proof that these rumors about Lying Lester being "gay" are complete baloney.

Although, in regards to that, Lying Lester MIGHT swing the other way if (and ONLY if) the Man he was to swing the other way for was 2012 Libertarian presidential candidate Gary Johnson. But that wouldn't make him "gay"... just a huge Gary Johnson fan.

Because - if Lying Lester were to get it on with another man, that Man would have to be Gary Johnson... and no other man. Because Lying Lester is not gay (as previously noted). Except for that one other time. Which, as I said in a prior post, does not count. Because Lying Lester did not enjoy it. That much.

Byline: This gary-tastic commentary was authored by Lord Lying Lester, purveyor of banging sexpots. GJID-9.

Wednesday, August 27, 2014

I Think I Dated Her Mother Once

Spanish actress Marian Aguilera Perez. Lying Lester is sure he dated her mother once. And Marian Aguilera Perez's mother is every bit as gorgeous as her daughter, one of the most beautiful women on the plant... according to my buddy Will Hart. But it is possible, I think, that Will might have meant to type "planet" instead of "plant".

By the way, I should note that at the end of the date I banged her. Both the mother and daughter. We participated in what is known as a "three way", or a "ménage à trois". Beyond that, I am not going to do a blow-by-blow, as Lying Lester is a gentleman who does not kiss and tell. Or make sweet passionate love to a mother and daughter and tell.

All I can say that Lying Lester left both mother and daughter MORE than satisfied. So much for these rumors about Lying Lester being "gay", right? Although, in regards to threeways - of which Lying Lester has been involved in MANY - Lying Lester would definitely be up for a threesome that included Gary Johnson and Kate Prusack, the woman who was his fiancée as of 2009.

This would be, however, the first threesome that Lying Lester would be involved in that wasn't composed of Lying Lester and two CHICKS. Hmm. I wonder if Kate Prusack would like to watch? If you know what I mean.

Byline: This gary-tastic commentary was authored by Lord Lying Lester, purveyor of 3 ways. GJID-8.